Character building

Arbitrary characters were not Dickens’s only problem. Most words were not represented by arbitrary characters and had to be constructed from the shapes that Gurney gave to alphabetical letters. Dickens found these constructed Gurney symbols hard to read. He was floundering in a ‘sea of perplexity’ because he saw shorthand symbols as pictures rather than combinations of letters, comparing them to ‘the Chinese inscriptions on an immense collection of tea-chests, or the golden characters on all the great red and green bottles in the chemists’ shops’.[1] In the eyes of the novice shorthand learner, the symbol for the word disadvantageous became a ‘skyrocket’ and the word expectation the ‘beginnings of a cobweb’. He is right, as you can see from the images below. But David couldn't read what the skyrocket and cobweb were saying. How should he have divided the symbols up? Hover over the images to find out.

The 'skyrocket' symbol, standing for the word 'disadvantageous'. Hover over the image to see what each shape stands for.

The 'cobweb' symbol, standing for the word 'expectation'. Hover over the image to see what each shape stands for.

David's problem was that he did not know how to make full words out of the alphabetical letter shapes. He needed to recognise that the skyrocket symbol was a combination of shapes for <d> + <s> + <advantage> + <s> and the cobweb shape was a combination of <x> + <p> + <ct> + <s> + <n>. Building letter-shapes into characters (writing) and deconstructing characters into letter-shapes (reading) clearly needed a lot of practice.

References

[1] Charles Dickens, David Copperfield, edited by Jeremy Tambling (London: Penguin, 2004), 551, 553.